1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405
//! Landlock is a security feature available since Linux 5.13.
//! The goal is to enable to restrict ambient rights
//! (e.g., global filesystem access)
//! for a set of processes by creating safe security sandboxes as new security layers
//! in addition to the existing system-wide access-controls.
//! This kind of sandbox is expected to help mitigate the security impact of bugs,
//! unexpected or malicious behaviors in applications.
//! Landlock empowers any process, including unprivileged ones, to securely restrict themselves.
//! More information about Landlock can be found in the [official website](https://landlock.io).
//!
//! This crate provides a safe abstraction for the Landlock system calls, along with some helpers.
//!
//! Minimum Supported Rust Version (MSRV): 1.63
//!
//! # Use cases
//!
//! This crate is especially useful to protect users' data by sandboxing:
//! * trusted applications dealing with potentially malicious data
//! (e.g., complex file format, network request) that could exploit security vulnerabilities;
//! * sandbox managers, container runtimes or shells launching untrusted applications.
//!
//! # Examples
//!
//! A simple example can be found with the [`path_beneath_rules()`] helper.
//! More complex examples can be found with the [`Ruleset` documentation](Ruleset)
//! and the [sandboxer example](https://github.com/landlock-lsm/rust-landlock/blob/master/examples/sandboxer.rs).
//!
//! # Current limitations
//!
//! This crate exposes the Landlock features available as of Linux 5.19
//! and then inherits some [kernel limitations](https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/userspace-api/landlock.html#current-limitations)
//! that will be addressed with future kernel releases
//! (e.g., arbitrary mounts are always denied).
//!
//! # Compatibility
//!
//! Types defined in this crate are designed to enable the strictest Landlock configuration
//! for the given kernel on which the program runs.
//! In the default [best-effort](CompatLevel::BestEffort) mode,
//! [`Ruleset`] will determine compatibility
//! with the intersection of the currently running kernel's features
//! and those required by the caller.
//! This way, callers can distinguish between
//! Landlock compatibility issues inherent to the current system
//! (e.g., file names that don't exist)
//! and misconfiguration that should be fixed in the program
//! (e.g., empty or inconsistent access rights).
//! [`RulesetError`] identifies such kind of errors.
//!
//! With [`set_compatibility(CompatLevel::BestEffort)`](Compatible::set_compatibility),
//! users of the crate may mark Landlock features that are deemed required
//! and other features that may be downgraded to use lower security on systems
//! where they can't be enforced.
//! It is discouraged to compare the system's provided [Landlock ABI](ABI) version directly,
//! as it is difficult to track detailed ABI differences
//! which are handled thanks to the [`Compatible`] trait.
//!
//! To make it easier to migrate to a new version of this library,
//! we use the builder pattern
//! and designed objects to require the minimal set of method arguments.
//! Most `enum` are marked as `non_exhaustive` to enable backward-compatible evolutions.
//!
//! ## Test strategy
//!
//! Developers should test their sandboxed applications
//! with a kernel that supports all requested Landlock features
//! and check that [`RulesetCreated::restrict_self()`] returns a status matching
//! [`Ok(RestrictionStatus { ruleset: RulesetStatus::FullyEnforced, no_new_privs: true, })`](RestrictionStatus)
//! to make sure everything works as expected in an enforced sandbox.
//! Alternatively, using [`set_compatibility(CompatLevel::HardRequirement)`](Compatible::set_compatibility)
//! will immediately inform about unsupported Landlock features.
//! These configurations should only depend on the test environment
//! (e.g. [by checking an environment variable](https://github.com/landlock-lsm/rust-landlock/search?q=LANDLOCK_CRATE_TEST_ABI)).
//! However, applications should only check that no error is returned (i.e. `Ok(_)`)
//! and optionally log and inform users that the application is not fully sandboxed
//! because of missing features from the running kernel.
#[cfg(test)]
#[macro_use]
extern crate lazy_static;
pub use access::Access;
pub use compat::{CompatLevel, Compatible, ABI};
pub use enumflags2::{make_bitflags, BitFlags};
pub use errors::{
AccessError, AddRuleError, AddRulesError, CompatError, CreateRulesetError, HandleAccessError,
HandleAccessesError, PathBeneathError, PathFdError, RestrictSelfError, RulesetError,
};
pub use fs::{path_beneath_rules, AccessFs, PathBeneath, PathFd};
pub use net::{AccessNet, NetPort};
pub use ruleset::{
RestrictionStatus, Rule, Ruleset, RulesetAttr, RulesetCreated, RulesetCreatedAttr,
RulesetStatus,
};
use access::PrivateAccess;
use compat::{CompatResult, CompatState, Compatibility, TailoredCompatLevel, TryCompat};
use ruleset::PrivateRule;
#[cfg(test)]
use compat::{can_emulate, get_errno_from_landlock_status};
#[cfg(test)]
use errors::TestRulesetError;
#[cfg(test)]
use strum::IntoEnumIterator;
mod access;
mod compat;
mod errors;
mod fs;
mod net;
mod ruleset;
mod uapi;
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use crate::*;
// Emulate old kernel supports.
fn check_ruleset_support<F>(
partial: ABI,
full: Option<ABI>,
check: F,
error_if_abi_lt_partial: bool,
) where
F: Fn(Ruleset) -> Result<RestrictionStatus, TestRulesetError> + Send + Copy + 'static,
{
// If there is no partial support, it means that `full == partial`.
assert!(partial <= full.unwrap_or(partial));
for abi in ABI::iter() {
// Ensures restrict_self() is called on a dedicated thread to avoid inconsistent tests.
let ret = std::thread::spawn(move || check(Ruleset::from(abi)))
.join()
.unwrap();
// Useful for failed tests and with cargo test -- --show-output
println!("Checking ABI {abi:?}: received {ret:#?}");
if can_emulate(abi, partial, full) {
if abi < partial && error_if_abi_lt_partial {
// TODO: Check exact error type; this may require better error types.
assert!(matches!(ret, Err(TestRulesetError::Ruleset(_))));
} else {
let full_support = if let Some(full_inner) = full {
abi >= full_inner
} else {
false
};
let ruleset_status = if full_support {
RulesetStatus::FullyEnforced
} else if abi >= partial {
RulesetStatus::PartiallyEnforced
} else {
RulesetStatus::NotEnforced
};
println!("Expecting ruleset status {ruleset_status:?}");
assert!(matches!(
ret,
Ok(RestrictionStatus {
ruleset,
no_new_privs: true,
}) if ruleset == ruleset_status
))
}
} else {
// The errno value should be ENOSYS, EOPNOTSUPP, EINVAL (e.g. when an unknown
// access right is provided), or E2BIG (e.g. when there is an unknown field in a
// Landlock syscall attribute).
let errno = get_errno_from_landlock_status();
println!("Expecting error {errno:?}");
match ret {
Err(TestRulesetError::Ruleset(RulesetError::CreateRuleset(
CreateRulesetError::CreateRulesetCall { source },
))) => match (source.raw_os_error(), errno) {
(Some(e1), Some(e2)) => assert_eq!(e1, e2),
(Some(e1), None) => assert!(matches!(e1, libc::EINVAL | libc::E2BIG)),
_ => unreachable!(),
},
_ => unreachable!(),
}
}
}
}
#[test]
fn allow_root_compat() {
let abi = ABI::V1;
check_ruleset_support(
abi,
Some(abi),
move |ruleset: Ruleset| -> _ {
Ok(ruleset
.handle_access(AccessFs::from_all(abi))?
.create()?
.add_rule(PathBeneath::new(PathFd::new("/")?, AccessFs::from_all(abi)))?
.restrict_self()?)
},
false,
);
}
#[test]
fn too_much_access_rights_for_a_file() {
let abi = ABI::V1;
check_ruleset_support(
abi,
Some(abi),
move |ruleset: Ruleset| -> _ {
Ok(ruleset
.handle_access(AccessFs::from_all(abi))?
.create()?
// Same code as allow_root_compat() but with /etc/passwd instead of /
.add_rule(PathBeneath::new(
PathFd::new("/etc/passwd")?,
// Only allow legitimate access rights on a file.
AccessFs::from_file(abi),
))?
.restrict_self()?)
},
false,
);
check_ruleset_support(
abi,
None,
move |ruleset: Ruleset| -> _ {
Ok(ruleset
.handle_access(AccessFs::from_all(abi))?
.create()?
// Same code as allow_root_compat() but with /etc/passwd instead of /
.add_rule(PathBeneath::new(
PathFd::new("/etc/passwd")?,
// Tries to allow all access rights on a file.
AccessFs::from_all(abi),
))?
.restrict_self()?)
},
false,
);
}
#[test]
fn path_beneath_rules_with_too_much_access_rights_for_a_file() {
let abi = ABI::V1;
check_ruleset_support(
abi,
Some(abi),
move |ruleset: Ruleset| -> _ {
Ok(ruleset
.handle_access(AccessFs::from_all(ABI::V1))?
.create()?
// Same code as too_much_access_rights_for_a_file() but using path_beneath_rules()
.add_rules(path_beneath_rules(["/etc/passwd"], AccessFs::from_all(abi)))?
.restrict_self()?)
},
false,
);
}
#[test]
fn allow_root_fragile() {
let abi = ABI::V1;
check_ruleset_support(
abi,
Some(abi),
move |ruleset: Ruleset| -> _ {
// Sets default support requirement: abort the whole sandboxing for any Landlock error.
Ok(ruleset
// Must have at least the execute check…
.set_compatibility(CompatLevel::HardRequirement)
.handle_access(AccessFs::Execute)?
// …and possibly others.
.set_compatibility(CompatLevel::BestEffort)
.handle_access(AccessFs::from_all(abi))?
.create()?
.set_no_new_privs(true)
.add_rule(PathBeneath::new(PathFd::new("/")?, AccessFs::from_all(abi)))?
.restrict_self()?)
},
true,
);
}
#[test]
fn ruleset_enforced() {
let abi = ABI::V1;
check_ruleset_support(
abi,
Some(abi),
move |ruleset: Ruleset| -> _ {
Ok(ruleset
// Restricting without rule exceptions is legitimate to forbid a set of actions.
.handle_access(AccessFs::Execute)?
.create()?
.restrict_self()?)
},
false,
);
}
#[test]
fn abi_v2_exec_refer() {
check_ruleset_support(
ABI::V1,
Some(ABI::V2),
move |ruleset: Ruleset| -> _ {
Ok(ruleset
.handle_access(AccessFs::Execute)?
// AccessFs::Refer is not supported by ABI::V1 (best-effort).
.handle_access(AccessFs::Refer)?
.create()?
.restrict_self()?)
},
false,
);
}
#[test]
fn abi_v2_refer_only() {
// When no access is handled, do not try to create a ruleset without access.
check_ruleset_support(
ABI::V2,
Some(ABI::V2),
move |ruleset: Ruleset| -> _ {
Ok(ruleset
.handle_access(AccessFs::Refer)?
.create()?
.restrict_self()?)
},
false,
);
}
#[test]
fn abi_v3_truncate() {
check_ruleset_support(
ABI::V2,
Some(ABI::V3),
move |ruleset: Ruleset| -> _ {
Ok(ruleset
.handle_access(AccessFs::Refer)?
.handle_access(AccessFs::Truncate)?
.create()?
.add_rule(PathBeneath::new(PathFd::new("/")?, AccessFs::Refer))?
.restrict_self()?)
},
false,
);
}
#[test]
fn ruleset_created_try_clone() {
check_ruleset_support(
ABI::V1,
Some(ABI::V1),
move |ruleset: Ruleset| -> _ {
Ok(ruleset
.handle_access(AccessFs::Execute)?
.create()?
.add_rule(PathBeneath::new(PathFd::new("/")?, AccessFs::Execute))?
.try_clone()?
.restrict_self()?)
},
false,
);
}
#[test]
fn abi_v4_tcp() {
check_ruleset_support(
ABI::V3,
Some(ABI::V4),
move |ruleset: Ruleset| -> _ {
Ok(ruleset
.handle_access(AccessFs::Truncate)?
.handle_access(AccessNet::BindTcp | AccessNet::ConnectTcp)?
.create()?
.add_rule(NetPort::new(1, AccessNet::ConnectTcp))?
.restrict_self()?)
},
false,
);
}
#[test]
fn abi_v5_ioctl_dev() {
check_ruleset_support(
ABI::V4,
Some(ABI::V5),
move |ruleset: Ruleset| -> _ {
Ok(ruleset
.handle_access(AccessNet::BindTcp)?
.handle_access(AccessFs::IoctlDev)?
.create()?
.add_rule(PathBeneath::new(PathFd::new("/")?, AccessFs::IoctlDev))?
.restrict_self()?)
},
false,
);
}
}